Questioning IPv6 Security
by Laura DeNardis, Ph.D.
Published July 2006; Posted December 2006


Abstract:

 

IPv6 requires IPSec, so its more secure than IPv4, right? Wrong and wrong.

One commonly cited rationale for upgrading to IPv6 is the claim that the newer Internet Protocol provides vastly improved security over IPv4. This article describes how conceptions of IPv6 as more secure than IPv4 are somewhat misleading and how implementation realities indicate that IPv6 can actually create a less secure enterprise network environment.

 

bullet

Access paper
bullet

Approx. 84 kB

bullet

For help with .pdf file downloads, please check out the help topic.

bullet

Return to Security Webtorials menu

bullet

Return to Business Communications Review Gold Sponsor Archives


About the author:

Laura DeNardis is a computer networking and security analyst residing in Stamford, CT, and a 20062007 Visiting Fellow at the Information Society Project (ISP) at Yale University. She holds engineering degrees from Dartmouth (A.B.) and Cornell University (M.Eng.) and a Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies from Virginia Tech.

 

This article is reproduced by special arrangement with our partner, Business Communications Review.

 

Please note: By downloading this information, you acknowledge that the sponsor(s) of this information may contact you, providing that they give you the option of opting out of further communications from them concerning this information.  Also, by your downloading this information, you agree that the information is for your personal use only and that this information may not be retransmitted to others or reposted on another web site.  Please encourage colleagues to download their own copy after registering at http://www.webtorials.com/reg/.