- The Data Center LAN Evolution Series
- A Webtorials Thought Leadership Discussion
- Dr. Jim Metzler, Moderator
- Featuring Arista, Avaya, Brocade, Cisco Systems, Extreme Networks and HP
There has been a lot of interest recently in
OpenFlow - a communications protocol that enables the separation of the
control of packets from the forwarding of packets. By separation
is meant that the forwarding of the packets occurs on an OpenFlow
switch and the control of those packets occurs on a separate
controller.
The OpenFlow specification itself is being developed by the Open Networking Foundation (ONF).
One of the things that is interesting about the ONF is that its founding and board member are Deutsche Telekom, Verizon, facebook, Google, Yahoo and Microsoft. At first it may seem strange that companies such as Google, facebook and Yahoo are so involved with the development of new communications protocols. However, given that separating the control and the forwarding of packets onto separate devices is somewhat of a radical idea, one could argue that the initial advocates would have to be non-traditional players.
The definitive paper on OpenFlow is entitled "OpenFlow: Enabling Innovation in Campus Networks." The paper was written in 2008 by researchers at some of the US's most prestigious universities; i.e., Stanford, Berkeley, Princeton and MIT.
The first sentence of that paper states "This whitepaper proposes OpenFlow: a way for researchers to run experimental protocols in the networks they use everyday." That sentence sets up the theme for this month's discussion: Does OpenFlow actually enable the innovation and cost savings that the articles in the press have been talking about or is OpenFlow just a science experiment by some really bright people?
The OpenFlow specification itself is being developed by the Open Networking Foundation (ONF).
One of the things that is interesting about the ONF is that its founding and board member are Deutsche Telekom, Verizon, facebook, Google, Yahoo and Microsoft. At first it may seem strange that companies such as Google, facebook and Yahoo are so involved with the development of new communications protocols. However, given that separating the control and the forwarding of packets onto separate devices is somewhat of a radical idea, one could argue that the initial advocates would have to be non-traditional players.
The definitive paper on OpenFlow is entitled "OpenFlow: Enabling Innovation in Campus Networks." The paper was written in 2008 by researchers at some of the US's most prestigious universities; i.e., Stanford, Berkeley, Princeton and MIT.
The first sentence of that paper states "This whitepaper proposes OpenFlow: a way for researchers to run experimental protocols in the networks they use everyday." That sentence sets up the theme for this month's discussion: Does OpenFlow actually enable the innovation and cost savings that the articles in the press have been talking about or is OpenFlow just a science experiment by some really bright people?
- Continue reading the summary: Does OpenFlow Make Sense in Enterprise Networks?
- Complete Transcript / Digest: Does OpenFlow Make Sense in Enterprise Networks?
- Original Discussion: Does OpenFlow Make Sense in Enterprise Networks?
- Access the related paper: OpenFlow: Enabling Innovation in Campus Networks
- Related discussion: What's the Best Alternative to Spanning Tree?
- Related Discussion: Does Converging the LAN and SAN Make Sense?
- (Webtorials membership required for all above content. Click here to register or if you forgot your username/password.)
In October and November we had yet another spirited discussion, led by Jim Metzler, about the future of the Data Center LAN.
This is a concise summary of "what we learned" from Jim. Additionally, there's a complete transcript/digest of the entire discussion in an easy-to-read and print .pdf format.